full-disclosure - Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mikelieman at barryscott.com (mike lieman)
Subject: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

It all boils down to this, without regard for with side you cheer for.

If you can't PROVE your candidate won, with the same certainty that you 
and your bank can PROVE you checking account balance, you might as well 
just stay home and screw the wife.  At least you'll have some fun.

Let me challenge EVERYONE out there...

YOUR VOTE DID NOT COUNT.  And if you contend otherwise, PROVE IT.

Or STFU about the Fairness of the elections.  Inauditable machines are a 
joke.  You wouldn't use them for ATM's so why trust your vote to them.

I mean, freaking Microsoft Access?

Oh, and WHY did Nevada, with KNOWN GOOD electronic machines (The State 
Gaming Commission oversees it, and They're NOT going to allow ANY 
tarnishing of THEIR reputation for Fairness.