| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:37:28 EST, Matt.Carpenter@...icor.com said: > todays hacker community. But the realities are that we are paranoid enough > to watch access to said systems to avoid at least 99% of local hacking, > eliminating that from feasibility. We are? At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them - and I'm pretty sure that they were *not* on the lookout for somebody out in the parking lot (or *inside* the next building over) with a laptop and a Pringle's can. And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean *anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be unsupervised due to the design of the polling booth? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041111/97e28f23/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists