full-disclosure - RE: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mikelieman at barryscott.com (mike lieman)
Subject: RE: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked

>>>>>Look at the difference between exit polling and actual results. 
> 
> 
> The election results and exit polls differ, therefore you assume the
> election results are wrong? This is really dumb. There are endless
> reasons to believe that exit polls are inaccurate. For one thing,
> they're self-sampling: they ask you whether you want to participate.
> 
> Of all the bad arguments made to claim the election was hacked this is
> the easiest to dismiss.

Not so easy to dismiss actually.  In this example, wouldn't the drift 
caused by self-sampling happen in ALL 50 states?

It doesn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2004_us_discrepancy.gif

consider this chart.

Hmmm... Small sample sizes would have shown swings BOTH ways...

Hmmm... Faults in methodology would be seen in ALL the states...

Nope and Nope.

You got any better ideas than "The Election was Hacked"?

I don't.

Damn Nevada and their State Gaming Commission... They show that the 
Polls DO match the real vote...

Regards,

Mike

P.S.  Anon. Cowards who send critical email without valid return 
addresses for replies are dumbasses...

-- 
Mike Lieman
Information Technology Director
Barry Scott Insurance Agency