From: davefd at davewking.com (Dave King)
Subject: WiFi question

As far as handheld devices to aid you in your quest go, there are 
several options.  If you've got a Pocket PC around you can try 
ministumbler, which is basically the Pocket PC version of netstumbler.  
It's free and would probably do most of what you want.  If you want more 
and you're willing to fork out some cash (I believe it's around $3000) 
AirMagnet can do some really cool stuff but it's probably overkill for 
you. 

If you're feeling brave and can get a hold of an Ipaq you can replace 
Windows with Familiar Linux (www.handhelds.org) and then install Kismet 
(www.kismetwireless.net) which is a great free WiFi detecting/sniffing 
utility.  Kismet can even work with a gps reciever and triangulate the 
location of the access point (although gps systems don't tend to work 
well in buildings).  This option is what I use since I could run it on 
an Ipaq I picked up off Ebay cheap and has all the features I need, plus 
it's free.

Laters,
Dave King
http://www.thesecure.net

Colin.Scott@...lc.com wrote:

>List,
>
>I'm an expert in nothing so when I saw this I had to ask, as Im sure theres
>someone out there that is a WiFi expert.
>
>Google has found no answer so here goes.
>
>Last night we saw a new access point appear. No problems its an ad-hoc
>network so its someone's machine with XP on configured for their home W-LAN
>probably.  Running Netstumbler shows more on it though.
>
>You get 2 Access Points showing this ESSID for a few seconds. Then you get
>a 3rd, then a 4rth. Then the first two drop off, this repeats forever.
>Always using a different MAC address when a new AP appears. The APs are all
>WEP enabled (which I cant crack cos I dont have the savvy or the tools :) )
>and this goes on forever.
>
>The MACs are all from different pools (i.e. assigned to different
>manufacturers) so the only conclusion is that they are all spoofed MACs.
>
>I have walked around the office and as far as I can tell its coming from
>this office (the IT dept), basing that assumption on signal strength.
>
>Anyone seen any tools that do this?   I would love a little hand-held
>gadget that would help me find it (like the scanner in Alien!)
>
>Answers on a post card :)
>
>Colin.
>
>
>
>
>
>**************************************************************************************
>
>This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information.  If you 
>are not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in error, it may
>be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the 
>information which it contains.  Under these circumstances, please notify 
>us immediately by returning this mail to 'mailerror@...lc.com' and deleting
>this e-mail from your system.
>
>Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily
>reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries.  Cadbury
>Schweppes Plc will not be bound by any agreement entered into as a result
>of this email, unless its intention is clearly evidenced in the body of the email.
>Whilst we have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and
>attachments are free from viruses, recipients are advised to subject this mail
>to their own virus checking, in keeping with good computing practice. Please
>note that email received by Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries may be
>monitored in accordance with the prevailing law in the United Kingdom.
>
>**************************************************************************************
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>  
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists