full-disclosure - Why is IRC still around?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Why is IRC still around? 

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:40:26 EST, Danny said:

> 1) A hell of a lot of viruses/worms/trojans use IRC to wreck further havoc?
> 2) A considerable amount of "script kiddies" originate and grow through IRC?
> 3) A wee bit of software piracy occurs?
> 4) That many organized DoS attacks through PC zombies are initiated through IRC?
> 5) The anonymity of the whole thing helps to foster all the illegal
> and malicious activity that occurs?

And is there *anything* on that list that is in the least bit IRC-specific,
or can any *other* IM system work just as well?

> What would IT be like today without IRC (or the like)? Am I narrow
> minded to say that it would be a much safer place?

Only if you *also* manage to stomp out AIM, and MSN Messenger, and Yahoo,
and Jabber, and...  Because if you don't, they'll just pick up and move
elsewhere.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041119/0c023717/attachment.bin