| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:12:31 EST, "Crotty, Edward" said: > I'm not a Win based guy (troll?) - Un*x here - and even I was offended by #1. > > There is such a thing as "runas" for Windows. Yes, but is *the main design* of the system "run as a mortal, and use the 'runas' for those things that need more"? Or is the *main design* "We'll just elect the first user as Administrator, and include 'runas' in case somebody wants to Do It The Right Way"? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041119/0cc240b5/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists