full-disclosure - University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

I asked very nicely...and didn't say it wasn't in some weird way
connected and normally I do delete the messages I don't want to see. But
I also contacted people directly if I feel that the list will have
nothing to add to the talk.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Steve Wray
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:09 PM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers 
> Challenge Bush Win In Florida
> 
> Todd Towles wrote:
> > Did the charter say something about political 
> messages?..please take 
> > it off the list guys if possible...
> 
> Actually, I thought that particular post was in the spirit of 
> the list...
> 
> It seemed to me to address technologies and methodologies.
> 
> I didn't think that it dwelled on party political issues. 
> Though, to be honest, I think Paul should have sent that last 
> one just to the addressee not to the list. But he does come 
> up with some gems so he won't go on my plonkers list :)
> 
> If you want to be truly pedantic as to what counts as 
> political, well... 
> there wouldn't be much to choose from. Everything is politics 
> if you squint hard enough.
> 
> I find the best method of dealing with full disclosure is 
> that every time you see someone post something you consider 
> off topic or a troll or whatever suits your taste, simply 
> filter their address out.
> 
> Filtering by subject doesn't help much as trolls will post to 
> *anything* but trolls *will* post. So as long as I filter out 
> anyone that seems like a troll (or otherwise an idiot) full 
> disclosure comes up with some gems.
> 
> And the best part is that if someone on your plonker list 
> says something genuinely interesting, they will doubtless be 
> quoted by someone else so you may still get to read it. And 
> the list has an archive.
> 
> Without filters I'd have left FD years ago...
> 
> 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> >>[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
> >>Schmehl
> >>Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:22 AM
> >>To: Jason Coombs; Gregory Gilliss; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> >>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers 
> Challenge Bush 
> >>Win In Florida
> >>
> >>--On Wednesday, November 24, 2004 05:39:31 AM +0000 Jason Coombs 
> >><jasonc@...ence.org> wrote:
> [massive snip]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>