lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: gautam.singh at gmail.com (Gautam R. Singh) Subject: If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all start doing it? In my opinion the whole policy of being offensive retaliatory attacks etc are too 'BUSH' , one should try all legal avenues 1st. Spammers would eventually try to get back on you after u retaliate. and in this crossfire of DoS & DDoSing 'innocent' user will be the one who get caught up in the middle. Strict policy & following on them legally would give right signals . Ofcourse wen all this fails we can form a joint coalition against spammers now where does UN comes in? ~ Gautam On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:45:05 +1100 (EST), Dave Horsfall <dave@...sfall.org> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Michael R. Schmidt wrote: > > > Have you read the Geneva Convention? Or better yet "The United Nations > > International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". Read it, the > > whole thing, and then bitch and moan. Do you really think Terrorists > > live by it? > > About as much as Amerika does... > > > Article 7 > > No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading > > treatment or punishment. > > Which pretty much says it all. > > -- Dave > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > -- Gautam R. Singh [mcp,ccna,cspfa,] t: +91 9848 525 074 | pgp: http://gautam.techwhack.com/key/ | ymsgr: er-333 | msn: ro0_@...mail
Powered by blists - more mailing lists