full-disclosure - RE: Scan for IRC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: RE: Scan for IRC

On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 03:25 +0000, Nikolay Baramov wrote:
> Other ports commonly used are 7000 and 9000.

And another, perhaps even more commonly used port, is 443 since that is
allowed unproxied/uninspected through most firewalls.

(clear-text IRC on port 443, although IRC can also be run over SSL)

Regards,
Frank

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050121/4c1107cf/attachment.bin