full-disclosure - Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Mar 25 03:03:26 2005
From: wireless.insecurity at gmail.com (Vladamir)
Subject: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack

I want to know because I just think it's weird. BSD has repeatedly 
responded consistently, so why hasn't Windows (especially after5 
revisions)??

Aditya Deshmukh wrote:
> AD> The win32 tcp stack was stolen from bsd
> 
>>                         ^^^^^^^^^^
>>Get your facts right.
> 
> 
> Yes bsd lic was used so they dint actually steal it - but as it was 12 am
> when I send the mail so please excuse me for the mistake.. :) 
> 
> But I say in the lower lines in my that it was not copied properly. Now I
> will crawl back into my hole 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>