| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed Mar 30 09:18:11 2005 From: mjc at redhat.com (Mark J Cox) Subject: windows linux final study > Yes, but did you actually verify their research using their methodology > to see if they screwed up? Here's all the raw data you need to duplicate their report: http://people.redhat.com/mjc/ And yes, you do get significantly different results. Some commentary: http://blogs.redhat.com/people/archive/000201.html Mark -- Mark J Cox / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists