full-disclosure - Blair is more important than network security?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

This website is powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux security-enhanced OS

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue May  3 11:08:04 2005
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Blair is more important than network security?

 This is a good thread. On the ITSafe website (a new security advisory
site setup by uk.gov) it says the following...

"
ITsafe News Issue 2005/02

The normal plan is for ITsafe News to be published on a monthly basis.

The April 2005 Issue has been withheld due to restrictions on
publication of new material by Government Departments during the
General Election, as detailed in the Cabinet Office guidance document.

"

Great stuff isn't it? This kinda goes to show UK gov is setup wrong
with regards to internet security...
Another reason *not* to vote for Blair?

Heres the thread:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v/browse_thread/thread/6f85a52dcc070ff9/2c27f84763afc3b2#2c27f84763afc3b2

Thanks, n3td3v