| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon May 9 21:09:10 2005 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:59:16 PDT, Day Jay said: > It was figured out long ago pal, the fact of the > matter is and that I pointed out numbskull is that he > should automate getting of the stack pointer like all > of the other one's do. Except the code you were penis-extender-waving around as an example of how you have to steal lame exploits you can't even fix. Figure out how to get that 1700 automated in *your* code, and then we'll talk. (I'd not get on your case about it, except that the code you posted has *more* hardcoding in it than the code you're complaining about). > It's a default value hardcoded > in..let it go. So now you're admitting it's a default value, not a hardcoded one? Whatever happened to standing up for your position? (And you're still missing the point - if it's a changeable value with a default, it's not hardcoded). > You and your gay lover can continue looking at kiddie > porn now. When all else fails, resort to ad hominem attacks. You know, with a bad attitude like that, it's not surprising that you can't get access to any better exploits to steal. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050509/acda8df3/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists