| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu Jun 30 18:46:57 2005 From: emf at obfuscation.org (Erik Fichtner) Subject: Publishing exploit code - what is it good for Joachim Schipper wrote: > This is doubly true if we're not talking about a dedicated pentester, > but about a sysadmin with a networking/security background who likes to > verify that the patches did, indeed, work. Likewise; a sysadmin that likes to verify that their other security management tools work properly: firewalls, IDS's, VA GUI's, ... ...especially when there isn't a patch yet. -- Erik Fichtner; Unix Ronin "Mathematics is something best shared between consenting adults in the privacy of their own office" - Adam O'Donnell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050630/54d734e9/signature.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists