full-disclosure - <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Jul 30 00:24:42 2005
From: deeper at gmail.com (Daniel)
Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco
	Security Presentation

This raises an interesting point, if intellectual property is sent in
error, do any of the laws pertaining to said property apply 100% or is
there a weird shift of how they are applied?





On 7/29/05, Russell Smoak <rsmoak@...co.com> wrote:
> All,
> 
> These recipients received an email from Austin Mckinley as Cisco Systems.
> 
> This messasge was sent in complete error and includes intellectual
> property of ISS and Cisco Systems.  Please delete and do not distrbute
> the information any further.
> 
> If you have any quesitons, please contact the Cisco PSIRT team.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Russell Smoak  <rsmoak@...co.com>
> Sr. Manager, PSIRT
> Customer Assurance Programs
> c i s c o S y s t e m s
> Phone: 615-791-0972
> Cell: 615-545-6473
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>