full-disclosure - <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCisco Security Presentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Jul 30 03:05:07 2005
From: lyal.collins at key2it.com.au (Lyal Collins)
Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCisco
	Security Presentation

Ianal, but I think jurisdictions may have issues with receiving and
using/profiting from stolen 'property', regardless of whether that property
is an information/intangible asset or a tangible asset.

In practical terms the information is 'published' as in available to a broad
range of readers.
Available != free to use without consequences in all possible circumstances.

As to the rights and wrongs at the centre of this thread - let the
discussions proceed!

Lyal

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of J.A.
Terranson
Sent: Saturday, 30 July 2005 11:51 AM
To: Jason Coombs
Cc: Russell Smoak; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; nanog@...it.edu;
fergdawg@...zero.net
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's
controversialCisco Security Presentation

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:

<cutting to the chase>

> Now, if RC4 had never been used to create a product and had been kept 
> as a trade secret, and that secret had been published, then it would 
> not have become, automatically, an unencumbered algorithm that could 
> be used by anyone with impunity. There being no way other than theft 
> of trade secret for a third party to come to know the algorithm, had a 
> court order been obtained to halt the spread of the secret the 
> algorithm itself could very well have been kept as protectable 
> intellectual property until such time as the company that enjoyed a 
> commercial advantage through preservation of their RC4 trade secret 
> had concluded the public distribution of a product that somebody else 
> could have reverse engineered.

The problem here is essentially one of mass distribution.  There are now
*millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation.  Nobody can
assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is not
completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

"A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone." Diana
Hubbard (of Scientology fame)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/