full-disclosure - Re: MS not telling enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Aug 19 04:08:23 2005
From: ivanhec at gmail.com (Ivan .)
Subject: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics

Hi J.A. 

Well done, anyone else who knows of people committing fraud against
isc2 should report them. Unfortunately I don't think its feasible for
isc2 to check everybody.

They do random credential checking and I should I know, since I was
audited after I passed the exam.

The CISSP cert is the best security cert around, without a doubt.

cheers
Ivan Coric, CISSP

On 8/19/05, J.A. Terranson <measl@....org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, DAN MORRILL wrote:
> 
> > Anyone have any statistics they can share on how many people get their CISSP
> > revoked due to ethical issues?
> 
> I have first hand personal knowledge of 2 CISSPs who were brought to the
> attention of ISC2 for (a) forging a college diploma, and (b) participating
> in a blatant fraud against one of their clients, respectively.
> 
> And we all know of the great numbers of CISSPs who could not *possibly*
> have met the minimum practice requirements (hrmmm... You're 17, and you
> meet the prereqs?  Yeah, riiighttt.).
> 
> ISC2 cert is not policed, and therefore, it is worthless.  Worse than
> worthless, as it purports to "certify" the character and nature of a
> certificate holder, and does so while making zero attempt to actually
> insure the implied endorsement is both valid and warranted.
> 
> --
> Yours,
> 
> J.A. Terranson
> sysadmin@....org
> 0xBD4A95BF
> 
> 
> I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
> a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
> bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
> are intended to support.
> 
> don zweig, M.D.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>