Date: Sun Aug 28 04:44:47 2005
From: kf_lists at digitalmunition.com (KF (lists))
Subject: J. A. Terranson

Great... thanks for the extra commentary. Now how about you both shut 
the fuck up and disclose something, other than the fact that you are 
both douche knobs.
-KF


ericscher@....com wrote:

>I did a dumb thing today.
>
>I decided to be nice to someone who didn't deserve it and correct his
>mistakes offline so that he wouldn't have to look like a dumbass in public.
>In return, I got an earful of profanity. Honestly, I should have known
>better.
>
>I've watched Terranson participate on this list long enough to know that
>he's not merely rude and obnoxious, he's mean. Bottom line, when you're
>dealing with someone who isn't a particularly good person; there's no point
>in trying to treat them like a human being. Like the man said; it wastes
>your time and annoys the pig.
>
>I get it. This is a place where he gets to feel like a big man. A tough
>guy. Fine. Whatever floats his boat.
>
>HOWEVER, that's no excuse for:
>
>a) Acting like a JackAss. (Is that what the J.A. stands for?)
>b) PUTTING OUT BAD INFORMATION.
>
>For the record, Kid... (Act like a child, you'll get treated like one.)
>
>1) An Autonomous System is a network or group of networks under the control
>of a single administrator and/or administrative policy.
>
>2) A "Multihomed" network is one which has more than one WAN connection to
>one or more service providers.
>
>3) The one has nothing to do with the other. ALL Autonomous systems are NOT
>multihomed. In fact, the vast majority are not. If you actually understood
>what an autonomous system was, you'd know that. But then, you wouldn't have
>put your foot in your mouth.
>
>4) Access Control Lists ARE traffic shaping devices. A device is a
>contrivance, invention or technique serving a particular purpose. In this
>case, the purpose being served is the movement of packets. The packets may
>be moved to another port or they may be moved to "the trash". The ACL tells
>the machine to examine the packet based on certain defined criteria that
>the administrator chooses and make decisions about the movement of the
>packet based on that criteria. This may serve a security purpose or it may
>not. 
>
>5) Access Control Lists are constructed in a particular manner; complex to
>simple. Specific to general. They don't HAVE to be written that way, but
>they should be and there is a damned good reason for it. Once a packet
>matches a particular line, the packet is moved. It may go to another port
>or it may get dropped; but the point is that it doesn't stick around for a
>second analysis. If you put a deny statement about a particular subnet
>ABOVE a permit statement for a particular host FROM that subnet, it's too
>late. The packet from that host has already been dumped. But hey, if you
>don't mind having a buggy network because you insist on doing things YOUR
>way, go ahead and write your ACL's any way you want. Not my problem.
>
>
>As has already been pointed out, this is a subject better addressed in a
>textbook. Whether you want to learn Cisco ACLs, iptables or whatever; you
>need some in depth subject matter. This is a complex subject and one in
>which you CLEARLY need remedial study.
>
>
>One last thing, Kid...
>
>You said that you could suggest some books for me?
>
>If those are the same books that you got YOUR monumentally incorrect
>information out of, no thanks.
>
>I actually know something about this subject, and I'd like to keep it that
>way.
>
>
>You may now feel free to have the last word. I'd know that sort of thing is
>important to someone like you.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>  
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists