full-disclosure - [Fwd: MM - #$%@ Kill Google!]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Sep  9 14:43:33 2005
From: chromazine at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak)
Subject: [Fwd: MM - #$%@ Kill Google!]

First thought A"top or bottom" hmmm sounds kinky;)....if I tell this to 
a 14 year old does someone somewhere have to report it. Anyway my brief 
take is below.

It is Yahoogroups who seeemed to have started the cult of top posting. 
They asked me to do it that way. I never used to do it. Note with all 
the Katrina Messagee relay stuff  I hasve been doing I FELL ASLEEP ON MY 
BAD ARM and so hasve to rest to geet feunctionality back. So u folks 
will be spared much more on this subject.... P.S. AIt was on bcrants I 
was first asked to do it. ...but it seems to be the norm in yahooland.

Have Fun,
Sends Steve

Gareth Davies wrote:

> Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
>
>> Ahem, but they still like the products, problems or not. Killing MS 
>> is not the answer.
>> Contrary to uber-nerd beleif, there is no rule about top posting - 
>> but yea, I shoulda still trimmed.
>
>
>
> Answer: Usually below the question.
>
>
> Question: Where do you see answers in relation to the question?
>
> Isn't that the case?
>
> Same goes for points you are addressing, you don't read from the 
> bottom up, you read the top down, so top-posting is just disturbing 
> the natural reading order.
>
> Cheers!
>