[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri Sep 9 15:41:41 2005
From: youreallythoughtiwouldgiveyoumy-dshield at yahoo.com (n e w s)
Subject: Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
>Tom Ferris wrote:
>
>
>>Vendor Status:
>>Mozilla was notified, and im guessing they are working on a patch. Who
>>knows though?
>>
>>
>
>That seems like a gross mischaracterization, at least by looking at the
>Bugzilla bug filed by you which I believe this corresponds to. The bug
>was reported two days ago (Sep 6), the first comment came less than an
>hour after that, and the first attempted fix was attached less than two
>hours after the bug was filed. Further comments explained how it was
>proving hard to find what and where was actually going wrong to put in
>the right fix. 10 replies total in less than two days. To me it seems
>obvious work is being done.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Hi, I was looking for the Firefox bug report mentioned, and after
searching for quite some time was not able to find the thread on
Bugzilla. Not sure if I am doing something wrong, but if someone has a
link to the url of Tom's post to Bugzilla, I'd be grateful if the link
found its way onto this list. TIA!
n e w s
Powered by blists - more mailing lists