lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:58:21 2005 From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael Holstein) Subject: Suggestion for IDS > If you NAT a lot, PIX can't handle the load. It also isn't flexible > enough. Huh? .. the FWSM (which is PIX and you can have 4 of them in a chassis) can handle 100 intefaces, 5gpbs, 100k CPS, and 1M concurrent per blade. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/ps4452/ Show me an OpenBSD system that can handle 400 interfaces, 20gbps, and 4M connections (and can do HSRP, etc). (I'm not trying to start an open-source "holy war" on a newsgrop .. I use pf too, where I need the granularity -- just not on the whole network). ~Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists