full-disclosure - urgent info require

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Sep 28 09:29:21 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: urgent info require 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:20:57 -0000, adnan habib said:
> i want  to implement juniper (netscreen) solution in my company ,,, moveover 
> i want to replace cyberguard from juniper ... is there any one let me know 
> any strong point that will support me in replacement like weakness in 
> cyberguard etc,,

First off, a 'Subject: urgent info require' is likely to land you in a lot
of spam filters.  'Subject: Need comparison of netscreen and cyberguard' would
do a lot better.

It sounds like you've already made up your mind to replace the cyberguard
with netscreen - what reason(s) did you already have (so we don't repeat those)?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050928/22e5de1d/attachment.bin