full-disclosure - Interesting idea for a covert channel or I just didn't research enough?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu Oct  6 22:53:32 2005
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Interesting idea for a covert channel or I
	just didn't research enough?

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:52 -0400, Michael Holstein wrote:
> Webbugs, which use unique URLs under an <IMG> tag, are an excellent 
> example of using logfiles to <DO STUFF>.

Except that "vi", "less" or "notepad" don't import anything. 

You're not looking at your log files with a web browser, do you??

-Frank

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051006/4b0fd196/attachment.bin