full-disclosure - Comparing Algorithms On The List Of Hard-to-brut-force?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Order Openwall GNU/*/Linux 2.0 on a CD with delivery worldwide

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue Nov  1 17:43:15 2005
From: gautam.bipin at gmail.com (Bipin Gautam)
Subject: Comparing Algorithms On The List Of
	Hard-to-brut-force?

hello list,

Which Algorithm in the list is hard hard (more resource/computation
consuming) to brute-force... (in order?) considering all other factor
'ALMOST' similar?

views?
----------
Blowfish
AES
Twofish
AES-BLOWFISH
Serpant
CAST5
AES-Twofish
Serpant-AES
AES-BLOWFISH-SERPANT
Twofish-SERPANT
Triple DES
AES-Twofish-Serpant
Serpant-Twofish-AES

 * Feel free to discuss algorithms NOT LISTED here and also the ones
used by FILE-COMPRESSION utilities ???

Even if you know a geleral statistic abt. a few of these or any
experience/info please share. I'm trying to draw a nice statistic BUT
couldn't find it elsewhere.

--
Bipin Gautam
http://bipin.tk

Zeroth law of security: The possibility of poking a system from lower
privilege is zero unless & until there is possibility of direct,
indirect or consequential communication between the two...