full-disclosure - new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Nov  2 20:30:37 2005
From: full-disclosure at pchandyman.com.au (Greg)
Subject: new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bkfsec" <bkfsec@....lonestar.org>
To: <ad@...ss101.org>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

ad@...ss101.org wrote:

>I just don't like such insisted contradiction when proof is here that's
>all...have been able to test it on 9 windows + 1 98SE and there is always
>someone to put the doubt on it ... my reaction maybe suck but I thought it
>was clear...........................
>
>

<snip>

> To be honest, anyone who doesn't understand the previous paragraph, needs 
> to shut the fuck up, report their results, and let the rest > of us who 
> have a clue sort the shit out.

It isn't hard to prove he is wrong. Takes about 30 seconds, if that. I can 
understand someone misses something which is why I reported that person was 
wrong. That was all I did. I don't honestly care THAT much about it. 
However, if the fool cant take being wrong, that proves his worth which is 
why I don't care what he says in future. No honest-to-goodness proper 
researcher cares about being corrected when it is that easy to prove they 
made a mistake. I have seen the real ones thank people on this list and 
others when this has happened. They are the researchers I read.

I know this is FULL disclosure but do we need to expose being incapable of 
being wrong?

Such is life.

My last post on the subject. Seems pointless going any further. You either 
accept you are wrong or thrash about like a 6 year old. I accept the 
differences between French and English version but didn't see that till 
after my last post. Perhaps if the original poster could do the same and 
realise that the majority of Windows users are English speaking, we could 
leave it at that. It explains my mistake. Hopefully he accepts it explains 
his instead of coming up with more of the same.

Greg.