full-disclosure - Return of the Phrack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Nov 25 14:59:13 2005
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Return of the Phrack High Council

Youre playing with fire. Fire that cannot be put out with words but
only inflame the situation of which you are misinformed.

Your opinion is noted, yet you dont have a right to gag my opinion
just because you don't agree with it.

I have more right to be on a security list than random people like you
who have never contributed security related information to the
international security community, or have a mailing list of your own,
and helped vendors behind the scenes to protect their security from
script kids who wish to destroy it.

I have done all above listed and continue to do so. If anyone is
trolling, its individuals such as yourself and infosecbofh who have
expressed their hatred for me and my underground security group in
public. Finally, is your web site very secure? Best go check

On 11/25/05, Cassidy Macfarlane <cmacfarlane@...mmond-miller.co.uk> wrote:
> OK, OK, I ignored the troll earlier about Schneier, but please
> *don't* now start having a go at Phrack ffs.
>
> I thought that you had killed off the n3td3v 'personality'?
>
> I realise I am writing a personal opinion email with no new security
> info,
> But there was no point in you adding your 0.02p to this discussion.
>
> 'outdated'??? Have you read 'smashing the stack'?
>
> No?
>
> Thanks for playing.