| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 06:19:42 2005 From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.strangled.net (Aditya Deshmukh) Subject: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance > Seeing how my question was ignored. I will tell you the answer. > > There is no requirement in SOX to do this. Why cant you use google to find out this ? ------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.nonprofitrisk.org/nwsltr/archive/employprac091005-p.htm *In the para 4* "Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical and open work environment." *In para 6* <----- this is the one that you want "Provide Employees Multiple Avenues to Report Concerns" While employees will hopefully feel comfortable raising concerns directly with their supervisors, many employees are reluctant to raise concerns with line management for fear of retaliation, especially where their concerns pertain to unethical or illegal conduct by their line managers. Therefore, nonprofits should provide several options for employees to raise concerns, including the option of raising a concern anonymously. ------------------------------------------------------------------- If you read the last line in para 6 you will find that anon mailbox is a requirement for SOX compliance. And mailbox was ment for email Michael :) But I think that "with a post and some concrete" mailbox will be Indeed be far more secure..... ________________________________________________________________________ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists