full-disclosure - IT security professionals in demand in 2006

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue Dec  6 04:43:07 2005
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: IT security professionals in demand in 2006

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Andre Ludwig wrote:

> Alphabet soup != technical skill,

And really, that is, in a nutshell, the problem.

These certifications were supposedly going to tell us who knew what, but
just as with the coveted PhD, they are useless for their stated purpose.

Let's face it: these certs are an industry unto themselves, and nothing
more.  Just like much of "higher education" in general - the only
difference with the certs is that you can get rich without being a 200
year old multi campus Ivy League university (along with the standard
accompanying 2 billion dollar "endowment").

We need to get back to interviewing people and testing their skills in
person, and stop relying on greedy third parties to "certify" people.

What good is a certification if they "certify" an idiot?  If they'd offer
a refund of wasted wages these might mean something - at least stand
behind your "certification"!!!

It's disgusting, but SANS (*) and their ilk are just 21st century versions
of the 19th century "University" pyramid scheme.

At least *some* of the universities degrees are worth something (i.e.,
I've never met an MIT graduate who was clueless in their "chosen field",
but I've met a LOT of SANS certified people who couldn't find a SYN in a
flood.

(*) note: used as one example out of 400
candidates.  While SANS is every bit as bad as any other, they are
probably not any worse.  of course, YMMV.)

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
are intended to support.

don zweig, M.D.