full-disclosure - agreed certs dont mean that much..but needexperience..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Dec  9 16:06:46 2005
From: amilabs at optonline.net (AMILABS)
Subject: agreed certs dont mean that much..but
	needexperience..

You will need ccnp for the foundation stuff, routing etc befor you can touch
ccsp. If you go the ccsp route but are weak in IP basics etc.. the ccsp will
be very difficult to work through

  _____  

From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Joel Jose
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:29 PM
To: Kerry Thompson
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] agreed certs dont mean that much..but
needexperience..

ok. so i must now concentrate on getting a vedor certificate. here in my
place cisco is a very popular one especially in learning centers. they have
a ccna and ccnp as the most popular ones. for me.. as a aspiring security
profesional will ccnp be a valid choice?.. or should i go in for a ccsp? 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051209/feb32980/attachment.html