full-disclosure - A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATEDLIST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu Dec 15 16:35:27 2005
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A
	MODERATEDLIST

> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  
> MAKING THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A 
> SECURITY RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL 
> INFORMED CHOICES IN MY DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING 
> LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF 
> THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS LIST.  MODERATING 
> WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND WOULD BRING IT 
> ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.
> 
> ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.

I am in 150% support of you not using CAPS. As if it needs to be said
again, there are moderated lists you can join...go join them and quit
trying to change FD.

As I stated on FD in March, "if you wanted a clean list that is
moderated, I would suggest 
you start with Security Basics or Bugtraq." -
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2005-03/0737.html