full-disclosure - XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Dec 21 17:59:09 2005
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com

I release information about Yahoo and Google, I don't see how my name
goes in the same list as GroundZero and InfoSecBOFH. All i'm doing is
defending Yahoo and Google researchers from being told not to disclose
vulnerabilities on FD, is that such a bad thing?

On 12/21/05, Edward Pearson <Ed@...tymail.co.uk> wrote:
> Why has this become a trolling?
> "if noone tell him what a stupid fag he is"
> Are we back at fucking middle school? Have we decended to the level of
> 10 year olds??
>
> Ground Zero, I've seen your company website(s) and your products. All I
> say is I think you have several very good resons to pay FUCKING close
> attention to what is said on this list. Work it out.
>
> The only people who seem hell bent on ruining this list for everyone
> are:
> InfoSecBOFH
> n3td3v
> Ground Zero Security
>
> None of these people have anything to bring to the table.
> Lets see at least one real vuln report/exploit from one of you, and then
> the other two have to concentrate on growing up enough to not troll it
> or make stupid pre-school comments.
>
> Come on guys!!! I'm beginning to thing that actually you're not bigger
> than this...
>
> Ultimatly, if you've got problems with each other, do it on MSN, AIM,
> IRC, USENET whatever, just not my inbox.
>
> Have a fucking excellent day.
>
> - Ed (BTW, Ground Zero's has my alais since 1995, now I see that this
> chump is going round putting a black mark by it)
>
> -----Original Message-----e
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
> Sent: 21 December 2005 17:17
> To: GroundZero Security; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com
>
> You trolled this thread by saying Watchfire should stop disclosing
> vulnerabilities for Yahoo and Google. You get the response you deserved
> to get. Now you're running off the thread now with your tail between
> your legs, because everyone has told you that Google and Yahoo
> vulnerabilities (especially XSS) will never be banned from FD.
>
>
> On 12/21/05, GroundZero Security <fd@....org> wrote:
> > yes you are right, but its like if noone tells him what a stupid fag
> > he is, he will keep posting and posting his irrelevant crap and just
> > ignore the tons of private mail he receives. i'm sorry for adding to
> the noise, but its just too tempting.
> > i try to ignore it. but i cant promise i will, the last mail he sent
> > just asks for a reply :P but ok...must...resist.....
> > btw my name is not groundzero, thats my company :)
> >
> > greetz
> > -sk
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>