full-disclosure - Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Jan 11 23:15:43 2006
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
	"Vulnerability Statistics"

* Matt Zimmerman:

>> Yes, this puzzles me too, but on the other hand, Debian became a CNA,
>> and Debian's official policy is geared away from "responsible
>> disclosure" -- all bug reports are supposed to be public.
>
> Debian isn't a CNA; as far as I know, it isn't possible for
> organizations to become CNAs.

<http://cve.mitre.org/cve/cna.html#cnas> lists organizations, not
individuals.  The requirements are clearly geared towards
organizations, too.