full-disclosure - HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Mar 17 14:42:47 2006
From: simon at snosoft.com (Simon Smith)
Subject: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall.

Mike,
    I just had to respond to you.

Mike Owen wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Simon Smith <simon@...soft.com> wrote:
>   
>>     Flames like yours are useless. If you do not know how to answer the
>> question that I am asking, then just be quiet. Mark Coleman is one of
>> the few people that seems to have understood my question and provided me
>> with a viable solution. Again, thanks Mark!
>>
>>     
>
> Adriel or Simon or whatever the hell you're calling yourself these days,
>
>   
My real name is Alex Baxter, so feel free to call me Alex

> You're asking a bullshit question. 
Well they say that you catch flies with shit... seems to have caught you. ;]
> You're basically saying that ssl is
> broken, so you want to tunnel something through ssl that'll be secure
> if the ssl wasn't there. Don't fucking use ssl in the first place then
> if you don't like it.
>   
I'm not basically saying that SSL is broken, you're just not bright
enough to understand what I am saying (and you, like many others make
assumptions). I am saying that SSL has acceptable risks for certain
applications and non-acceptable risks for others. I am also saying that
I am looking for a way to secure "some" of the data going through the
SSL tunnel.
> I'm honestly quite surprised you haven't just replied to the list yet
> with the standard YHBT. YHL. HAND. That's all you are doing here, is
> just trolling, posting crap to get an argument going so you can sit
> back and laugh.
>   
Well, you are surprised because you are an idiot. You assume that I am
doing something that I am not doing.

I've actually had quite a few useful responses to my questions, none
from you of course. But to those who've helped me and understood what I
was asking, Thank You!

> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>   


-- 
Regards, 
	Jackass