full-disclosure - Re: Noise on the list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue Mar 21 20:00:32 2006
From: davek_throwaway at hotmail.com (Dave Korn)
Subject: Re: Noise on the list

Edward Pearson wrote:
> I shouldn't have to get the fucking spamfilter involved when we're
> talking about a mailing list.

  Yes, you fucking should.  This is a NON-moderated list.  There are plenty 
of perfectly good moderated lists out there which you won't have to filter. 
But /this/ list is a non-moderated list, on which every individual 
subscriber is handed the full responsibility for and control over what they 
do or do not see.  That's the whole point.

  In short, exactly what you want is perfectly easily available, but you'd 
rather complain about something else not being it.  That's like filling your 
car with diesel when it takes unleaded, complaining that your tank is now 
full of crap that you didn't want in it, and when someone points out that 
the other pipe on the same pump gives you unleaded you just stand there, 
waving the diesel hose and complaining about how *this* one ought to give 
unleaded as well because that's the one you want it to come out of.

  Go elsewhere and you will be happy.  Go to bugtraq, where you *will* be 
spoonfed the prefiltered predigested pap that appears to be what you want.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....