| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat Apr 1 04:32:49 2006 From: docbook.xml at gmail.com (Saqib Ali) Subject: Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IEvulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code On 3/31/06, Joe Ciechanowski <joe@...ismaggiore.com> wrote: > What do you guys think about these products for "secure" browsing / internet > use? > > http://www.download.com/3120-20_4-0.html?tag=srch&qt=bufferzone&tg=dl-20&search.x=0&search.y=0&search=+Go%21 Seem like http://www.trustware.com/ make this software I find it interesting that in the SpotLight section They have a photograf of the pentagon which reads: "A Government rated Trojan Horse Defense and Security System". Upon clicking on the link, I find NO information about any government institution using the application. And they do host a lot MP3s on their webserver. See: http://am.trustware.com/ (Illegal ???) I would be very wary of installing / buying such software. Here is the Netcraft Report for their website: http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.trustware.com I would say it is pretty low ranking for a site that claims to have developed a solution that solves all security problems. -- Saqib Ali, CISSP Support http://www.capital-punishment.net ----------- "I fear, if I rebel against my Lord, the retribution of an Awful Day (The Day of Resurrection)" Al-Quran 6:15 -----------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists