Date: Sat Apr  1 09:44:09 2006
From: ian.t7 at hotmail.co.uk (Ian stuart Turnbull)
Subject: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY


succinctly put.we cant all be wrong in that this prick is a moron can we? 
ayway its fitered now - it didnt get noral. now anything useful it might 
have to say will be missed. BIG deal now!!

>From: "php0t" <very@...rivate.com>
>To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:35:45 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from lists.grok.org.uk ([195.184.125.51]) by 
>bay0-pamc1-f13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 
>31 Mar 2006 19:36:41 -0800
>Received: from lists.grok.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])by 
>lists.grok.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F200CC8B;Sat,  1 Apr 2006 
>04:36:10 +0100 (BST)
>Received: from felipe.hu (jump.felipe.hu [195.228.157.209])by 
>lists.grok.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC77A07for 
><full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>;Sat,  1 Apr 2006 04:35:40 +0100 (BST)
>Received: from DORKA (jangce-2020.adsl.datanet.hu [195.56.20.242])by 
>felipe.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C592E6219for 
><full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>;Sat,  1 Apr 2006 05:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jGCwSX0I8zVOkzeEBBaSH+UwLHMWBwxHTI=
>X-Original-To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Delivered-To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>X-BeenThere: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: An unmoderated mailing list for the discussion of security 
>issues<full-disclosure.lists.grok.org.uk>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>, 
><mailto:full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure>
>List-Post: <mailto:full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>List-Help: <mailto:full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>, 
><mailto:full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Return-Path: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2006 03:36:42.0340 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[7E166240:01C6553D]
>
>
>   Dear technically challenged netdev,
>
>1) 'Is that the same as...' - ummm... you probably IMAGINED a different
>email to which you replied to
>2) The address is legit, it isn't 'hacked'. It has a story why I use it
>here, but it's not like anybody cares.
>3) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt - the world is bigger than gmail
>believe it or not.
>4) If I sent the email from gmail, it would show in the headers.
>5) If it was a spoofed email only used for subscription, the FD posts
>sent to it would not get back to me
>6) The email in question wasn't even an FD comment, it went straight to
>your inbox to avoid bugging others who still don't have you filtered
>(like me, until this very email). What did you do? Post it right back to
>the list. Nice.
>
>   Sure, everybody can filter, so can I. The thing is, i never NEEDED to,
>because there hasn't been anybody dropping such ignorance in my mailbox
>so often. I was hoping that you would either turn normal or keep your
>word and leave the list.
>Since the trolling just goes on, it's grep -v for you, especially after
>this stupid bullcrap you made up and decided to share with the probably
>not-so-interested list members. I responded this time because 1) it was
>a personal attack based on nothing, and 2) because it's my last email
>that has the word netdev in it. (sent or received ;]) - and i can keep
>my word, unlike 'some people'.
>
>php0t
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: n3td3v [mailto:n3td3v@...il.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:12 PM
>To: php0t; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO
>SERIOUSLY
>
>
>Is that the same as hacking someones "domain", accepting the Gmail
>confirmation to say you're allowed to send from a Gmail account with
>that hacked domain, then delete all forensic logs from the hacked domain
>and then go back to your Gmail account, where you can continue to send
>your inflamed FD comments from as very@...keddomain.com. Figures.
>
>
>On 3/31/06, php0t <very@...rivate.com> wrote:
>
>If you kept your word (and didn't post my emails back to the list), it'd
>be better. :)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: n3td3v [mailto: n3td3v@...il.com <mailto:n3td3v@...il.com> ]
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:47 PM
>To: php0t; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
><mailto:full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO
>SERIOUSLY
>
>
>Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do?
>Or haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of
>Outlook and Thunderbird yet? Figures.
>
>
>On 3/31/06, php0t <very@...rivate.com> wrote:
>
>For real, please keep your word.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
>[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
><mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk> ] On Behalf Of n3td3v
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM
>To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
><mailto:full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
>
>
>This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1
><http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID
>=131539&start=-1&reply=true>
>&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true  I almost choked on
>my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if you take down a
>site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade site straight
>away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated the pre
>plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its
>carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb
>criminals".
>
>
>On 3/31/06, n3td3v <n3td3v@...il.com> wrote:
>
>Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks
>right down my front when I looked at this article:
>http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1
><http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID
>=131433&start=-1> &threadID=15591&messageID=131433&start=-1
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>


>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

Powered by blists - more mailing lists