full-disclosure - Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed May 17 16:07:33 2006
From: davek_throwaway at hotmail.com (Dave "No, not that one" Korn)
Subject: Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

Pete Simpson wrote:

> This demonstrates that if the model were valid the minimum possible
> duration of complete collapse would be 87.9 seconds.

  Well then, this demonstrates that your model is not valid.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....