full-disclosure - n3td3v agenda revealed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Jun  3 19:52:14 2006
From: y0himba at technolounge.org (y0himba)
Subject: n3td3v agenda revealed

Don't take this wrong, I highly respect the folks here, but I wonder how
long it is going to take folks to realize that by dignifying his posts with
replies, you give him what he wants, you fulfill some need he has.  You also
perpetuate what he is trying to accomplish.  I am quite sure that there is
no reason to reply to him other than to use it as a stepping stone to appear
cool, "l33t", or tough, or whatever.  

Those of you who reply to the messages only please him.  You are responsible
for more garbage on the list than the original poster.  This "n3td3v" is
probably laughing at you because of your need to respond.  I have
successfully filtered him, and I recommend you do the same.  I am only
seeing the flood of spam of replies his messages generate.

Please, when he posts, just drop it.  Ignore it. There is NO NEED to reply.
The replies are worse than the original email, and the replies are by far
more "lame" than the original post due to the fact that you allowed your
buttons to be pushed, or even more pathetic, that you need to reply so
everyone else can see.

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of J.A.
Terranson
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:41 PM
To: n3td3v
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: re : [Full-disclosure] n3td3v agenda revealed

On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, n3td3v wrote:

> On 6/3/06, Anil Gulecha <anilgulecha@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > LOL
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> You're the kind of person who laughed when there were people planning 
> to throw planes into the world trade center, then after it happened 
> you still laughed.
>
> It is kind of why cyber security is in the same sorry ass state as 
> mainland security is right now.
>
> Regards,
>
> n3td3v

I'd like to think that in 20 or 30 years you will look back over the lame
ass shit you have posted here (and other victim fora) and cringe.  But I'm
not counting on it.

--
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

'The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments
it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest
limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the
people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever,
prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of
destruction.'

St. George Tucker

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/