lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat Jun 3 06:08:26 2006 From: joeljose420 at gmail.com (Joel Jose) Subject: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. its not just fair game. we had discussed it in tor irc chan. ok so you just made a apache mod for the black list. tor always did and always do allow anyone to block tor users if they please. but the easiness which tor gives for the blocking must not be overused to deny tor communications even for legitimate purposes(definition vague). hopefully the blacklists, apache mods.. and other methods of blocking tor are not "default" enabled. And hopefully the security cookbooks and other HOWTO's dont come with a default recommendation to enable these tor blocking modules. The admin needs to be educated about tor. Ideally he must be able to decide for himself the balance betrween anonimity and performance. He should be empowered to take his own decision. An educated and well informed decision. Remember " if privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy".. and hackers have better ways to protect their privacy.. but as of today.. legitimate users dont have that luxury.. tor is thier most practical hope. joel. -- As soon as men decide that all means are permitted to fight an evil, then their good becomes indistinguishable from the evil that they set out to destroy. - Christopher Dawson, The Judgment of Nations -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060603/22d2015a/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists