lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri Jun 23 06:44:36 2006 From: harlequin at earthlink.net (Eric Ericson) Subject: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Frankly, I always though the words "best solution" always paired well with the words "air strike". But maybe that's just me. -E2 -- Eric Ericson harlequin@...thlink.net When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. - Winston Churchil > From: "Randal T. Rioux" <randy@...cyonlabs.com> > Organization: Procyon Labs - IT Security R&D > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:18:47 -0400 > To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Will the spammer please stop! > > Dan B wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Karol Wiesek wrote: >>> Just add rule to Your procmail or any other stuff and ignore it. >>> >>> >> ,,,snip...snip... >> The best solution I see is sender verification, which I currently use on >> Postfix and this is the same MTA that is used for the list. It is a >> minor configuration change. Indeed it causes more traffic(verification >> of domain initially, and then a brief attempt to connect and send a mail >> to the sender), but that is nowhere near as much as this spam is generating. >> > > The words "best solution" should NEVER be used in the same sentence as > "sender verification," unless "not" separates them. It is obnoxious and > places the burden of your lack of effort or knowledge onto the sender. > > Randy > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists