lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri Jun 23 03:49:09 2006 From: degeneracypressure at gmail.com (Eliah Kagan) Subject: Re: Will the spammer please stop! On 6/22/06, Randal T. Rioux wrote: > The words "best solution" should NEVER be used in the same sentence as > "sender verification," unless "not" separates them. It is obnoxious and > places the burden of your lack of effort or knowledge onto the sender. I second this. In addition to being obnoxious, implementing sender verification on FD will prevent FD subscribers from receiving legitimate advisories and information sent by people who are justifiably unwilling to cooperate with sender verification. I would suggest that making a significant avenue of full disclosure (the FD list) more difficult to use by treating people who submit advisories like Microsoft treats people who activate Windows over the phone (i.e. by assuming they are miscreants) does not encourage full disclosure, and is consequently unsuitable for this list. -Eliah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists