[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat Jun 24 19:14:58 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Amazon, MSN vulns and.. Yes,
we know! Mostsites have vulnerabilities
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:45:47 EDT, Jason said:
> You have a lot of nerve! It was not too long ago that I recall you being
> the clueless one on the FD list.
Aye.. that he was, as we all were at one time (myself included, even if that
phase *did* predate the creation of FD by more than 2 decades). However,
Morning has had enough sense to pay attention and acquire at least some clue...
Having said that, I'll posit that Morning is right - Milw0rm is a site well
known enough that *by definition* an exploit showing up there moves it from
'0-day' to 'just another damned unpatched vuln'. After all, 0-day means "an
unknown exploit you can't defend against because you've never seen it". Which
is hardly the case for any Milw0rm exploit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060624/83eed26b/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists