lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat Jun 24 23:37:01 2006 From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron) Subject: Amazon, MSN vulns and.. Yes, we know! Most sites have vulnerabilities On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, David Taylor wrote: > > I guess our disconnect on this is my lack of knowledge on how the actual > exploits get submitted. I think I just assumed it was the person that > discovered the vulnerability and/or developed the exploit that submits it to > places like Milw0rm. > The problem is, they are not the only ones. > > On 6/24/06 9:11 AM, "Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote: > > > > Once again we are mostly in agreement, but there is one point I do > > disagree on completely. > > > > How would having the vulnerability being exploited by Bad Guys already, > > who get it via their sources, while not letting the Good Guys know about > > and put pressure on the vendor to fix help out? > > > > Like I said earlier, this isn't black and white and some vendors do things > > right, still, the one thing about Full Disclosure no one can dispute, > > despite whatever else it may be - it works. > > > > Now how is the exploits being out and just us not knowing about them help > > us any? The ones who use the for harm will do so regardless. > > > > Gadi. > > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists