lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:40:53 +0000 From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> To: n3td3v <n3td3v@...glegroups.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: A remote administration web server written in .JS files On 7/29/06, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > On 7/29/06, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > > [snip] > > You can have a server written in javascript, if the hacker knows his > > javascript well. > > [/snip] > > > > http://news.com.com/5208-7349-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19764&messageID=169318&start=-1 > > > > I'm not one to scare monger, but yeah. > > > > n3td3v > > Hello n3td3v list, > > Here is an example: > > http://www.acme.com/software/js_httpd/ > > It would be useful if the above can be hacked to run on Windows > systems as a remote administration tool. > > Don't just copy and paste though, write your own server, the link > should just be used as a proof of concept. > > Have fun. > Hello n3td3v list, I have an update, already folks have been submitting their own javascript servers to our e-mail (it doesn't actually take long to produce a concept server to support I/O in MS Windows with Javascript), then we seen folks on the CNET News site bring up "what if we use a Firefox plugin to block malicious JS code"... Here is what the Firefox user said: http://news.com.com/5208-7349-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19764&messageID=169381&start=-195 My reply doesn't just reference the javascript threat but basically covers any "Firefox is more secure than Internet Explorer fanboy" opinion on security. And even SANS at one point was part of that fanboy crowd, although (SANS reversed their stance later), the fact of the matter right now is... (Hackers wouldn't care even if Firefox was more secure...either way, so SANS and any fanboys are/were just arguing over ro/sy mantic wording.) Read my full reply: http://news.com.com/5208-7349-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19764&messageID=169384&start=-195 n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists