full-disclosure - Re: Do world's famous companies take care of their security?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:22:21 -0400
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "uncleron@...hmail.com" <uncleron@...hmail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Do world's famous companies take care of their
	security?

On 7/31/06, uncleron@...hmail.com <uncleron@...hmail.com> wrote:
> My experience has been that many companies simply do not care about
> security until they are forced to.

opinion

The problem with companies is that they are pubicly traded. This means
that if total profits for your company are 1,000,000,000 each year,
and you maintain a profit margin of 1,000,000,000 per year, you are
floundering.

I feel that if a company makes one billion per year, that is pretty
fucking good. I dont care if you make 900,000,000 the next year, and
950,000,000 the year after that. The fact that you are bringing almost
1 bil per year in profits is pretty sweet IMO.

With a pubicly traded company, making less one year then you did the
year before is a sign of attrition. SELL THE SHARES AND RUN!!!! Even
if you are only pulling .95 bil.

Just google boze and you will see what I am saying

-JP<who prefers to google booze and see what he iz saying>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/