lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:09:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Bruce Ediger" <eballen1@...st.net>
To: "full-disclosure" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: "Fire and forget" exploits?

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt wrote:

>  It seems like this kind of exploit is dying out, particularly as
> different flavors of Linux proliferate, each with their own slightly
> different libc and userland; in the Windows world, however, we still
> find "universal" exploits that work on NT4/2k/XP over a variety of
> service packs.

Doesn't this implicitly support Dan Geer et al's argument about
software monoculture?

In fact, wouldn't the "linux monoculture" concept constitute a bit
of a misnomer?  Each "slightly different" userland and libc would constitute
a different flavor, right?

Nevertheless, the received wisdom remains that "If linux took over from
Windows tomorrow, all the hackers would concentrate on linux flaws, and
we'd be in the same position."

-- 
Bruce Ediger
720-932-1954
eballen1@...st.net

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists