lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:03:13 +0200
From: "Gil Dabah" <arkon@...estorm.net>
To: "Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Code-Crunchers@...testar.linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [Code-Crunchers] windows vulnerability? [was:
	Re: 137 bytes]

With all due respect to Alex.
It's still not the Mother.
You have to install DAV support for some Windows.

And Windows can read other DLL's from the network, if you set the path to
point there... of course, it's not the same case,
but it's also possible.

On 11/8/06, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, onisan wrote:
> > One thing is in this makes it even more interesting, most of the
> firewalls
> > do not block this download, so it's smallest and most dangerous
> downloader
> > at the same time :o
>
> What Alex did is very impressive! Matthew Murphy came up with the idea
> originally, I think, but it doesn't take from this amazing work in any
> way.
> *awe struck*
>
> I'd say more though, it's a vulnerability.
>
> If you can load a library remotely, and do so with no problems, it's a
> vulnerability in Windows. I am not sure of what kind quite yet.
>
> The mother of all downloaders.
>
> "The Zone has a new King!" <we're not worthy x3>
>         -- Jeff, Coupling (BBC, UK).
>
>         Gadi.
>
> > -- G
> >
> > 2006/11/8, Solar Eclipse <solareclipse@...eedom.org>:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:56:42AM -0800, Peter Ferrie wrote:
> > > > Why is the idata size present?  AFAIK, no Windows version checks it.
> > > > Four bytes shorter, then (stop at the idata rva non-zero byte)?
> > >
> > > You're right, you can remove the last field and bring the file size
> down
> > > to 133 bytes. That's what I get for claiming that the size can't be
> > > improved :-)
> > >
> > > Solar
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Code-Crunchers mailing list
> > > Code-Crunchers@...testar.linuxbox.org
> > > http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/code-crunchers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Code-Crunchers mailing list
> Code-Crunchers@...testar.linuxbox.org
> http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/code-crunchers
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists