full-disclosure - Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:43:37 +0100
From: endrazine <endrazine@...il.com>
To: David Litchfield <davidl@...software.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft

Hi,

David Litchfield a écrit :
> Hey all,
> What started out as a fun project for me turned out some serious results -
> "Which is more secure? Oracle vs Microsoft" is a paper I put together
> looking at the number of security flaws in the Oracle and MS database
> offerings. For those that are interested, you can grab a copy of the results
> here: http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf
> Cheers,
> David 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
No offense David, but those two products don't serve the same purpose : 
you just can't use
MS Sql for big databases. It's a bit like asking "which is more secure : 
Oracle or gcc" ?
What's the point ? How can this be relevant ??

Cheers,

endrazine-

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/