full-disclosure - Re: Busting The Bluetooth Myth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

This website is powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux security-enhanced OS

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:37:48 +0200
From: "Giorgio Fedon" <giorgio.fedon@...il.com>
To: "Kevin Finisterre (lists)" <kf_lists@...italmunition.com>
Subject: Re: Busting The Bluetooth Myth

Hi Kevin,

I could understand that vendors are charging simple CSR dongles (19
dollars??) up to thousands of dollars.
But the way to publish a paper making a direct reference (if someone is
aware about the underlying piece of software he is talking about) to a
particular vendor it's not so cute. Maybe they have written their firmware.

Worse is to sustain the fact that the world need a better bluetooth sniffer,
using the information that can be found inside the warezed version of the
tool. The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own research
without software piracy.

2007/4/1, Kevin Finisterre (lists) <kf_lists@...italmunition.com>:
>
> Giorgio if anything he is blowing the whistle on the vendors that
> charge a metric shit ton for a piece of hardware that is not necessary.
> -KF
>

[ CONTENT OF TYPE text/html SKIPPED ]

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/