lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 09:07:14 -0700 From: "George Ou" <george_ou@...architect.net> To: "'Raven Alder'" <raven@...eyedcrow.net>, <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Security Researcher Not Particularly Humiliated Yeah that's a stupid accusation against you Raven. He was suggesting somehow that if you get your machine owned then you can't be protecting other people's computers or something and that was really retarded. Yes he WAS a troll. As for Apple going to the press to humiliate you, that's very typical of their PR operation. After the SecureWorks incident and after I spoke with their PR, I know them all too well. But even I'm shocked that they would bring your boyfriend in to this. Thanks for taking the tough questions from the audience. Don't mind this jerk and don't mind Apple. You have nothing to be ashamed of. Keep up the good work. George Ou -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Raven Alder Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 2:00 AM To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: [Full-disclosure] Security Researcher Not Particularly Humiliated Hiya -- > Security conference staff needs to do a better job of screening > their audiences to prevent this sort of harassment during > presentations. I must admit that I am afraid to present at future > conferences if there is the possibility of being humiliated like > this during my talks. As the researcher in question, I didn't feel particularly humiliated. Sure, I thought the guy was a troll, but I figured that he was just being a jerk to me because he had some chip on his shoulder and couldn't find anything to complain about in my talk. But really, his big tac-nuke against me was that there was some undisclosed bug in Apple's code? That's hardly my fault. I don't write their OS, and the thing was fully patched, firewalled, hardened, and still got popped. Shit happens. I didn't go public with it because I wanted a smoking gun first. Security is very much a "show me" industry, and I didn't want to make claims that I couldn't substantiate. I did approach Apple, and they pretty much blew me off. I sent them a detailed event report, offered up my system for forensic analysis, and offered to help in any way I could. They went to the press, gave a reporter my name (I had not gone to the press), and dished some crap about how I let my boyfriend use my computer and he probably did something to disable my firewall and cause it to auto-own itself or something. Dude. My boyfriend does not have admin permissions on my machine, for starters. Way to help, Apple. After realizing that Apple were not my friends and were more interested in their PR spin than they were in finding and fixing the problem, I stopped talking to them. I had several OS X geeks have a look at the system, and none of them were able to find anything more conclusive than I did. Forensics geeks, same thing. So, I dumped the filesystem for posterity, vowed that no OS X box was going on a hostile network again, and reformatted the thing. Sorry, folks, but I'm not going to share my filesystem dump with people that I do not already know and trust. Don't even ask. Not even if you're Apple. You leak my name to the press when I'm trying to help you find your flaw, you get no more help from me. All of this is pretty irrelevant to the talk I gave. Still, I don't feel that audience screening is the way to solve the problem -- I don't want to quash honest questions and interest in the projects I'm working on, and I think any screening that wouldn't be trivially defeated by lying-fu would be draconian enough to be detrimental to free and open discourse. There are always going to be trolls. I think the audience and convention response was about as good as it could have been -- the troll got told off by several people, two of them with the mike, but it was pretty clear that most people were more interested in the technical content of the talk than they were in his effort to get my goat. The conference organizers offered sympathy, and that was kind of them; I believe the guy got pitched out of the con for going on to harass a few other folks too. Charming gent. So, really, I don't think I have anything to be ashamed of, and I certainly don't feel humiliated. I can see why getting ad hominem questions might make getting up on stage more intimidating for future speakers, but I don't intend to let that shut me up. [grin] Cheers, Raven -- @ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists